Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert Generate coverage reports using only GitHub Actions #455

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2022

Conversation

hynek
Copy link
Member

@hynek hynek commented Dec 19, 2022

As discussed in #447 (comment)

Copy link
Member

@adiroiban adiroiban left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 99.81% // Head: 99.81% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (9e47434) compared to base (24f65a0).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            trunk     #455   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.81%   99.81%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        1661     1661           
  Branches      298      298           
=======================================
  Hits         1658     1658           
  Misses          3        3           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@hynek
Copy link
Member Author

hynek commented Dec 19, 2022

the irony of codecov hanging is not lost on me

@hynek hynek merged commit 3418975 into trunk Dec 19, 2022
@hynek hynek deleted the revert-coverage branch December 19, 2022 13:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants